Title page for ETD etd-03292006-112115

Type of Document

Thesis

Author

Schaefer, Christopher A

URN

etd-03292006-112115

Title

A QUESTION OF BIAS IN THE NORTH AMERICAN FLUTED-POINT SAMPLE

Degree

Master of Science

Department

Anthropology, Department of

Advisory Committee

Advisor Name	Title
Glenn H. Doran	Committee Chair
Rochelle A. Marrinan	Committee Member
William Parkinson	Committee Member

Keywords

North American Fluted-Point Database
statistical analysis
Kruskal-Wallis
modern population density
cultivated square kilometers

Date of Defense

2005-11-16

Availability

unrestricted

Abstract

A variety of statistical tests were used to analyze data from the fluted-point database compiled by Anderson and Faught (2000b) to determine if modern population density and/or cultivated square kilometers of land bias the fluted-point sample. Results for each statistical test are presented to show how the different tests can influence interpretation of the data. Ultimately, it was determined that only one test, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis, was appropriate for analysis of the data compiled in the fluted-point sample.
When the lower forty-eight states are conflated, statistical analysis showed that the fluted-point database was biased by modern population density and amount of cultivation. Counties with higher population density have more fluted-points recorded than those with lower population density. As with population density, counties with more cultivation per square kilometer have more fluted-points recorded than those with less cultivation. The same is true for the northeast, south, and midwest regions of the United States, as well as those states east and west of the Mississippi. There was no statistically significant relationship, however, between cultivation and modern population density and fluted-points recorded in the Western region.

Files

Filename		Size	Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)
Filename		Size	28.8 Modem	56K Modem	ISDN (64 Kb)	ISDN (128 Kb)	Higher-speed Access
	cs_thesis.pdf	1.79 Mb	00:08:17	00:04:16	00:03:44	00:01:52	00:00:09
	DATABASE.xls	615.94 Kb	00:02:51	00:01:27	00:01:16	00:00:38	00:00:03