|
Type of Document Thesis Author Hames, Jennifer L. Author's Email Address hames@psy.fsu.edu URN etd-04122011-143345 Title Can Smaller Steps Lead to Greater Progress?: Testing The Effects Of Two Types of Positive Self-statements On Self-esteem and Mood Degree Master of Science Department Psychology, Department of Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title Thomas E. Joiner Committee Chair E. Ashby Plant Committee Member Natalie Sachs-Ericsson Committee Member Keywords
- Bibliotherapy
- Negative Affect
- Self-esteem
- Positive Self-statements
- Positive Affect
Date of Defense 2011-03-04 Availability unrestricted Abstract The self-help literature avidly promotes the use of positive self-statements to boost self-esteem and mood; however, recent research provides evidence that positive self-statements may be harmful to people with low self-esteem. Prior research has only tested the effects of one type of positive self-statement (stable/global) on self-esteem and mood, but research on self-esteem maintenance processes, attitude change, and self-verification motives provides reason to believe that people with low self-esteem may benefit more from using unstable/specific positive self-statements. In order to test the effect of each type of positive self-statement on self-esteem and mood, high and low self-esteem participants were randomly assigned to one of three positive self-statement conditions (stable/global, unstable/specific, control) after experiencing a laboratory stressor. Results revealed that among high and low self-esteem participants, there was not a significant difference in mood and self-esteem as a function of their positive self-statement condition. Such results suggest that positive self-statements are not harmful to individuals; however, there may be an opportunity cost associated with using positive self-statements in the place more effective coping techniques.Files
Filename Size Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)
28.8 Modem 56K Modem ISDN (64 Kb) ISDN (128 Kb) Higher-speed Access Hames_J_Thesis_2011.pdf 530.45 Kb 00:02:27 00:01:15 00:01:06 00:00:33 00:00:02