Type of Document	Treatise
Author	Jorgensen, Michael Lund
URN	etd-04142008-142508
Title	Pastoral Poetry and Stravinsky: A Search for an Expanded Definition of Neo-Classicism through Exploration of the Relationship between the Eclogues of Stravinsky’s Duo Concertant and Petrarch’s Bucolicum Carmen
Degree	Doctor of Musical Arts
Department	Music, College of
Advisory Committee	Advisor Name Title Beth Newdome Committee Chair Evan Jones Committee Member Frank Kowalski Committee Member
Keywords	Neoclassicism Bucolicum Carmen Petrarch Duo Concertant Stravinsky
Date of Defense	2008-04-02
Availability	unrestricted
Abstract This treatise examines two movements of Igor Stravinsky’s (1882-1971) Duo Concertant. While writing the Duo Concertant Stravinsky read a book by his friend Charles Albert Cingria (1883-1954) about the poet Francesco Petrarca (1304-1374), known in English as Petrarch. The composition reflected the influence of Cingria’s writing about Petrarch. Stravinsky writes in his Autobiography: The spirit and form of my Duo Concertant were determined by my love of the pastoral poets of antiquity and their scholarly art and technique. The theme that I had chosen developed through all the five movements of the piece which forms an integral whole, and, as it were, offers a musical parallel to the old pastoral poetry. Music critic Eric Walter White dismissed Stravinsky’s words, explaining that “in the long run, it would be best to put Stravinsky’s various explanations on one side and accept the work at its musical face value.” Through examining the second and third movements of the work, marked Eglogue I and Eglogue II, this treatise aims to find a connection between Stravinsky’s music and Petrarch’s pastoral poetry. The term eglogue is French for the English term eclogue, which is a style of pastoral poetry. Petrarch wrote a set of twelve Latin eclogues between 1346 and 1352 called Bucolicum Carmen. The first two eclogues in the collection have striking similarities to Stravinsky’s music, and this paper seeks to document the relationship between the works. In the process, the treatise explores an expanded definition of neo-classicism—one that includes works that are inspired by Greek and Roman philosophy and artwork yet are modernized to fit the needs of the society from which it emerges. Chapter 1 gives a background on Stravinsky’s neo-classical works and the composition of the Duo Concertant. Chapter 2 explores the history of the eclogue from its creation in Alexandria by the ancient Greek poet Theocritus (c. 316-260 B.C.) to Petrarch. Virgil’s Eclogues are also discussed. Chapter 3 gives a historical context to Petrarch’s work through a discussion of his life, work, and philosophy. Chapter 4 compares and contrasts Petrarch and Stravinsky’s first eclogues, and Chapter 5 examines their second eclogues. Chapter 6 presents the conclusion.
Files	Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)     28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access    JorgensenMTreatise.pdf 1.14 Mb 00:05:17 00:02:43 00:02:22 00:01:11 00:00:06