|
Type of Document Thesis Author St. John, Heather Michelle Author's Email Address hms0504@fsu.edu URN etd-07012004-123103 Title Victim of Circumstance? Stealing Thunder and Attribution Theory Degree Master of Science Department Communication, Department of Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title Laura Arpan Committee Chair Arthur Raney Committee Member Davis Houck Committee Member Keywords
- persuasion
- interpersonal communication
- cheating
- infidelity
- stealing thunder
- attribution theory
Date of Defense 2004-06-14 Availability unrestricted Abstract In situations in which an indiscretion can be revealed to another party, a person has the ability to either divulge the information first or wait until he or she is confronted. Divulging the negative information first – i.e., stealing thunder - has been supported as a way to minimize the impact of the negative information. The following study coupled stealing thunder with attribution theory in an attempt to determine how stealing thunder affects perceptions of causality. Stealing thunder was associated with increased credibility ratings but did not result in greater external attribution or lower probability of guilt ratings. Credibility was positively correlated with external attribution, regardless of thunder condition.Files
Filename Size Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)
28.8 Modem 56K Modem ISDN (64 Kb) ISDN (128 Kb) Higher-speed Access HeatherStJohnThesis.pdf 665.97 Kb 00:03:04 00:01:35 00:01:23 00:00:41 00:00:03