Type of Document Dissertation Author VanLandingham, Gary Ryan Author's Email Address firstname.lastname@example.org URN etd-11082006-185115 Title A Voice Crying in the Wilderness - Legislative Oversight Agencies’ Efforts to Achieve Utilization Degree Doctor of Philosophy Department Public Administration and Policy, School of Advisory Committee
Advisor Name Title Frances Berry Committee Chair Carol Weissert Committee Member Earle Klay Committee Member Lance DeHaven-Smith Committee Member Keywords
- Program Evaluation
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative Oversight
Date of Defense 2006-10-24 Availability unrestricted AbstractState legislatures face challenges in obtaining reliable information about the policy choices they face and the effectiveness of previously established programs, and they have limited ability to enforce agency compliance with legal directives. To address these challenges, most state legislatures have created oversight offices and have endowed them with significant resources. These offices provide program evaluation and policy analysis services to their parent legislatures, and their work is intended to help improve legislative decision making and oversight.
However, these intended benefits will not be realized unless legislatures actually use the information produced by these offices. Research utilization literature has identified steps that evaluators and analysts can take to promote use in legislative environments. These steps can be categorized into two overall strategies—developing strong networks with decision makers, and astute marketing of research products. However, there has been little empirical information on whether these strategies are actually being used, or whether when used are related to increased satisfaction with and use of research products in the legislative environment.
This study bridges this gap and identifies and analyzes the strategies that state legislative oversight offices, which form a large class of evaluation and policy analysis units, are using to promote use of their work in the legislative process, and assesses how differences in the offices’ networking and marketing activities is related to how their work is valued and used by key stakeholders—legislative staff in leadership, appropriations, and committee positions. The institutional design of the offices—whether they are located within auditing or legislative units—and the research standards they have adopted—whether they conform to Government Auditing Standards which stress organizational independence or other standards that stress utility to stakeholders—are found to be key variables related to both the offices’ utilization activities and legislative stakeholder satisfaction and use of their work products. The study advances scholarship relevant to research utilization and the policy process and provides practical information that the evaluators and analysts can use to increase their value and serve as an effective voice speaking truth to power rather than a voice crying in the wilderness.
Filename Size Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)
28.8 Modem 56K Modem ISDN (64 Kb) ISDN (128 Kb) Higher-speed Access dissertationfinal.pdf 863.15 Kb 00:03:59 00:02:03 00:01:47 00:00:53 00:00:04